| Author |
Message |
NadeemM
Joined: 19 May 2006 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:04 pm Post subject: The proposed Siberian/Alaskan tunnel won't lead to a transat |
|
|
| What do you think? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sfgirl
Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 11:56 am Post subject: The proposed Siberian/Alaskan tunnel won't lead to a transat |
|
|
| no..there is a mountain range in the middle of the Atlantic..the Mid Atlantic ridge..to big to fool with |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tommyfourth
Joined: 23 Feb 2006 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 7:49 am Post subject: The proposed Siberian/Alaskan tunnel won't lead to a transat |
|
|
| Look at a map, and then try and see the difference between a Siberian/Alaskan tunnel, and a Trans-Atlantic tunnel.It's really not hard to see the sheer distance difference. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MeanCarleen
Joined: 07 May 2005 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:41 am Post subject: The proposed Siberian/Alaskan tunnel won't lead to a transat |
|
|
| Of course not......even in the shortest gap, a tunnel would still be lucrative because it would have to span thousands of miles, and cost more money then some countries have in their banks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JimJ
Joined: 19 Jul 2004 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:33 pm Post subject: The proposed Siberian/Alaskan tunnel won't lead to a transat |
|
|
| Maybe a long time in the future, but it would be a long deep drive to get across the Atlantic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pelagius
Joined: 09 Aug 2005 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 7:26 pm Post subject: The proposed Siberian/Alaskan tunnel won't lead to a transat |
|
|
| what a completely idiotic question. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|